They also allow for easy octothorpe (#) tagging. What was missing in the middle – the Markdown phase – was linking between notes as well as tagging, which is why I’m trying out Obsidian/Zettlr/Logseq in the first place.Īll three of them do wiki-style linking between Markdown files. I take notes on things in Zotero, I jot down thoughts in Markdown (previously in the aforementioned RedNoteBook), and then I synthesize the lot in Libreoffice with the Zotero plugin. If you start searching those terms, be prepared for lengthy manifestos about how to take notes.Īs for me, I guess I’m keeping it simple. As its name implies, Zettlr is inspired by the “Zettlekasten” method of Niklas Luhmann. Logseq is based on “block-level” linking, which itself builds on RemNote. Obsidian in particular has a lot of fans on Youtube (e.g., this video), who share their complex workflows and talk about how network graphs reveal new ways of thinking. Moreover, I get the sense that all of them have some very zealous adherents. I thought about writing up comparisons between these systems, but I think those sorts of posts abound – just DuckDuckGo “obsidian vs zettlr” or “zettlr vs logseq” and you’ll see what I mean. In fact, I have all three installed and may hop between them. However, given what these projects are doing, I do not feel locked into my choice. It meets my needs quite well, which are probably a bit more minimal than people might expect. So, I have tried both Zettlr and Obsidian – and I also tried a third system, Logseq – and have decided to adopt Zettlr. I was hoping to streamline blogging, note-taking, and other Markdown tasks in one system. I use it regularly to plan my weeks, I obviously use it for this blog (which is a static Jekyll site), and I started using it to jot down ideas in a journaling program called RedNoteBook. I asked because I’m using Markdown more and more. Both are Markdown editors which also provide valuable features on top, including linking together Markdown notes and varying degrees of Zotero support. See image: link from top-level-note to note 20210516121857, which should actually link to “Note with title as filename”.About a week ago, I took to my home Mastodon instance, scholar.social, and asked whether people preferred Zettlr or Obsidian. … does not understand UIDs defined in the YAML header, instead expects a note with that UID as filename. In this case, Obsidian does not understand that the “real” title is defined in the note’s YAML header. … understands UID-based links only if the UID is defined in the filename. While Zettlr understands that each of these notes has a title and an associated UID, Obsidian …: The *UID* of this note is defined in the YAML header. The *title* of this note is defined in the YAML header. Title: "Top-level note /with/ special characters! ζ?" For instance, suppose I have three notes: Unfortunately, Obsidian does not seem to understand UID-based links. Given that I keep changing my note titles a lot, I absolutely rely on Zettlr’s use of the never-changing UID for linking. In Zettlr, links to other notes always refer to the notes’ UID, a date-based 14-digit number, not to the notes’ titles. Unfortunately, I couldn’t figure out a way to make Zettlr and Obsidian fully compatible, and this is due to how the two apps handle internal links and information defined in the YAML header. Let me explain my problem: I have been setting up a Zettelkasten using the Zettlr app, and I would love to use Obsidian as well for the same stack of notes. Does anyone use Obsidian alongside with Zettlr, and how do you do it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |